What’s in Your Index?

 Executive Summary

  • Stretched metrics in the major indexes requires heightened attention to company fundamentals.
  • The ability to weed out weak or richly valued companies is an overlooked benefit of an active approach.
  • An active approach provides flexibility to pursue only the most compelling opportunities. 

By most measures, domestic equities are fully valued, and in some cases multiples are above their 10-year averages. As value investors we see the stretched metrics as cause for concern. The levels could lead to stock prices remaining flat for several months as the market waits for companies to grow into elevated valuations. A more troubling possibility is that inflated levels set the stage for a deeper sell-off should the economy falter.

Money for Nothing  

While we are not making a call on the direction of stocks or the strength of the underlying economy, we think investing in a portfolio of financially sound companies trading at attractive valuations is always a prudent approach. This concept is the cornerstone of our investment philosophy. That’s why we’re puzzled by the unabated flow of assets into passively managed index portfolios that hold stocks regardless of value or strength. As the chart shows, during the past 10 years flows into passive funds has totaled more than $1 trillion while $1.1 trillion has poured out of actively managed portfolios.

Annual Net Flows - U.S. Equity Mutual Funds

Heartland Advisors value investing portfolio manager perspective net flows chart

Source: FUSE Research Network, 1/1/1993 to 12/31/2016
Data reflects long-term open-end mutual fund flows excluding fund of funds.

The torrent of assets into passive products, we believe, could be contributing to pricing distortions in the major indexes. Market-cap weighted portfolios take nothing into account but market capitalization. As a result, large companies receive a greater portion of each new dollar invested than smaller ones—even if the larger companies have poor valuation metrics. In a sense, each new dollar invested is therefore blindly following other dollars already invested. This herd-following has the potential to be dangerous.

Valuations not for Free

A look at data for the Russell 3000® Value Index through the end of 2016, as pictured below, illustrates how even value-oriented names have seen their multiples balloon. On a price-to-earnings basis, companies in the Index are trading at an 18% premium to their 10-year average. Adding debt into the equation by looking at enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EV/EBITDA) makes a similar case. Based on consensus estimates for 2016, the Index is trading at 13.8x EV/EBITDA, or a premium of more than 25% to its long-term average. The expanded multiples come despite projections that earnings-per-share growth will slow over the next three to five years.

Russell 3000® Value Index Valuations

Heartland Advisors value investing portfolio manager perspectives valuations chart

Source: FactSet Research Systems, Inc., 12/29/2006 to 12/30/2016
Price/Earnings and Price/Sales ratios reflect weighted median calculations; EV/EBITDA ratios reflect weighted average calculations. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investors who believe holding a large number of names will mitigate risk may be overlooking the fact that an index approach requires holding some of the riskiest individual names in the market.  In contrast, bottom-up analysis allows investors to dig deep into a company and side step those determined to have weak balance sheets, poor management, or diminished prospects for revenue or margin growth.

Out of Sight, Out of Mind

Passive investors have been willing to overlook bloated valuations and business risks for the past several years because the index approach has produced solid returns. However, consider that low interest rates and accommodative Fed policy have resulted in a macro-driven economy and performance that is more tightly correlated among individual names. Both factors have been a significant tailwind for a passive approach.

With rates on the rise, capital allocation decisions should play a greater role in the relative success of businesses.  Volatility is also likely to move up in response to policy changes initiated by a new Trump administration. As market gyrations increase, so too will dispersions of returns—a necessary element of outperformance for active investors. Signs of a breakdown in correlations started to appear in November 2016 and we expect the trend to continue.

Prescription for Trouble?

Examples of hard-to-justify valuations and shaky balance sheets can be found throughout the major indexes, and Specialty Pharma provides some clear examples. The group’s leverage stands at 6.4x debt-to-EBITDA—more than double where the group was just three years ago. With rates on the rise, borrowing levels could eat into margins and debt levels will become a greater concern. Instead of taking an index approach of blindly buying shares of every company in the group proportionate to market-cap weights, we have taken a more common-sense approach and turned to fundamental analysis.

By digging deeper into names in the industry, we’ve uncovered AmerisourceBergen Corporation (ABC). Its debt to EBITDA is just 2.2x. The Pennsylvania-based business, along with two competitors, controls 90% of the drug distribution market. Its partnership with Walgreens has helped the company gain economies of scale, which has allowed it to be more aggressive in pursuing additional clients. Despite its attractive balance sheet, shares trade at approximately 7.5x EV/EBITDA.

Specialty Pharma is a single example but not an isolated case. As bottom-up investors we continue to find compelling opportunities in a broad range of sectors and industries. At the same time, our active process allows us to weed out businesses where our research points to an unfavorable balance of risk and reward.

We believe the value of this approach is often overlooked in the debate between active and passive management.

Please wait while we gather your results.


Heartland Advisors Value Investing Portfolio Manager Will Nasgovitz

Will Nasgovitz

Nasgovitz is CEO and Portfolio Manager of the Select Value and Mid Cap Value Funds and their corresponding separately managed account strategies. He also is CEO of Heartland Funds. He has 17 years of industry experience, 14 at Heartland.

Email Sign Up

  • I am a financial professional or institutional investor
  • I am an individual investor

©2018 Heartland Advisors | 789 N. Water Street, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI 53202 | Business Office: 414-347-7777 | Financial Professionals: 888-505-5180 | Individual Investors: 800-432-7856

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal.

There is no guarantee that a particular investment strategy will be successful.

Value investments are subject to the risk that their intrinsic value may not be recognized by the broad market.

The statements and opinions expressed in the articles or appearances are those of the presenter. Any discussion of investments and investment strategies represents the presenters' views as of the date created and are subject to change without notice. The opinions expressed are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. The specific securities discussed, which are intended to illustrate the advisor’s investment style, do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended by the advisor for client accounts, and the reader should not assume that an investment in these securities was or would be profitable in the future. Certain security valuations and forward estimates are based on Heartland Advisors’ calculations. Any forecasts may not prove to be true.

Economic predictions are based on estimates and are subject to change.

As of 12/31/2017, Heartland Advisors on behalf of its clients held approximately <0.01% of the total shares outstanding of AmerisourceBergen Corporation.

Statements regarding securities are not recommendations to buy or sell.

Portfolio holdings are subject to change without notice. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.

Sector and industry classifications as determined by Heartland Advisors may reference data from sources such as FactSet Research Systems Inc. or the Global Industry Classification Codes (GICS) developed by Standard & Poor’s and Morgan Stanley Capital International.

Heartland’s investing glossary provides definitions for several terms used on this page.

Heartland Advisors defines market cap ranges by the following indices: micro-cap by the Russell Microcap®, small-cap by the Russell 2000®, mid-cap by the Russell Midcap®, large-cap by the Russell Top 200®.

ALPS Distributors, Inc., is not affiliated with Heartland Advisors.