Cash Flow: An Equalizing Force in Analysis

 Executive Summary

  • The use of valuation metrics are a central element of Heartland’s 10 Principles of Value Investing™.
  • Cash flow analysis allows investment managers to cut through differences in accounting practices and capital intensity to unearth compelling opportunities.
  • In our view, price/cash flow is a useful complement to traditional valuation measures like price/earnings and price/book.

Cash flow analysis can be a powerful tool in evaluating stocks but it takes a nuanced approach for investors to leverage the full strength of the measure.

In its basic form, price/cash flow ratio (P/CF) allows investors to compare opportunities on a level playing field, because cash flows are insulated from variations in accounting methods that influence other metrics like earnings or book value. We view the ratio as an important starting point in evaluating businesses.  By adding additional layers, we’ve made it more robust at exposing variations in capital intensity required to produce streams of revenue across sectors.

Because P/CF is calculated using operating cash flow, it doesn’t include capital expenditures (cap-ex). Critics point to this as a weakness because the ratio is agnostic toward the amount that must be spent by a company to generate revenue. To that point, heavy industrial companies often come across as considerably cheaper than those in less investment intensive areas such as Information Technology (IT). To adjust for this, we use free cash flow when comparing names across industries because it accounts for spending for equipment and other reinvestments into the business.

When evaluating companies that have low cap-ex requirements but higher debt, we add another wrinkle to the equation. In these situations we look at free cash flow/enterprise value (FCF/EV). Given enterprise value includes debt and liabilities, this ratio is useful to judge relative cheapness of a company as well as its ability to pay for an acquisition.

Cash Flow Analysis in Action

The varying versions of cash flow analysis may seem better suited for an academic setting, but the following example of two names we’ve looked at illustrates how they can have real life implications in investment decisions.

WEC Energy Group, Inc. (WEC) is a utility operating primarily in Wisconsin and Illinois. TechnipFMC PLC (FTI) designs and manufactures equipment and provides services for energy companies.  We’ve chosen these companies to show how cash flow analysis can be used to compare businesses that have different investment needs and operate in very different areas of the market.    

The power company’s share price was $60.65, while TechnipFMC’s was a little more than half at $30.76. Estimates for WEC’s fiscal 2017 earnings per share stand at $3.10, translating to a forward 2017 price/earnings (P/E) of 19.66x. We expect TechnipFMC to earn $1.37 per share during the same period, resulting in a forward 2017 P/E of 23.68. Looking at these two companies solely on P/E, it appears that WEC is more attractively valued.

Rolling up Our Sleeves

To get a more complete picture of which is a more compelling opportunity, we want to strip out the effects of accounting policies on each name. For that we turn to a simple P/CF ratio. WEC’s estimated $1.6 billion in operating cash flow translates to a P/CF of 8.96x compared to TechnipFMC’s estimated ratio of 11.27x on operating cash flow of $1.2 billion. Using this measure WEC again appears to be more attractively valued. But what this simple analysis misses is the significant capital expenditures the utility requires to generate revenue.

When reinvestment costs are subtracted from the equation, free cash flow for WEC turns negative with the company generating negative free cash flow of -$555 million making the P/FCF ratio negative. The impact of reinvested capital is far less for TechnipFMC with free cash flow edging down to $719 million and a P/FCF multiple of 20.44x. Using this analysis, TechnipFMC is revealed to be significantly less expensive and we believe is the more efficient opportunity.

As a final check, we look at FCF/EV. The inclusion of debt and liabilities in the calculation provides a more accurate yield, in our opinion, and prevents companies from being rewarded for recent debt-financed expenditures. On this measure, TechnipFMC again appears to be the more attractive with a yield of more than 7.3% versus –1.9% for WEC. This suggests TechnipFMC generates greater resources to pay off its debt, buy back stock or make accretive acquisitions than does WEC.

Comparing WEC and TechnipFMC
  WEC Energy Group, Inc. TechnipFMC PLC
Share Price $60.65 $30.76
Earnings Per Share (forward 2017) $3.10 $1.37
Price/Earnings (forward 2017) 19.66x 23.68x
Price/Cash Flow 8.96x 11.27x
Price/Free Cash Flow (forward 2017) -34.58x 20.44x
Free Cash Flow/Enterprise Value Yield (forward 2017) -1.9% 7.3%

Source: Bloomberg L.P. and Heartland Advisors, Inc., as of 5/2/2017

By working through multiple layers of cash flow analysis, we were able to compare two different opportunities in distinct sectors in a way that provided a deeper understanding of which was trading at a more attractive valuation. While P/CF is just one of our 10 Principles of Value Investing™, we believe it is a foundation to our bottom-up approach to investing.

Please wait while we gather your results.


Heartland Advisors Value Investing Portfolio Manager Colin McWey

Colin McWey

McWey, CFA, is Vice President and Portfolio Manager of the Select Value and Mid Cap Value Funds and their corresponding separately managed account strategies. He has 15 years of industry experience, 8 at Heartland.

Email Sign Up

  • I am a financial professional or institutional investor
  • I am an individual investor

©2018 Heartland Advisors | 789 N. Water Street, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI 53202 | Business Office: 414-347-7777 | Financial Professionals: 888-505-5180 | Individual Investors: 800-432-7856

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal.

There is no guarantee that a particular investment strategy will be successful.

Value investments are subject to the risk that their intrinsic value may not be recognized by the broad market.

As of 3/31/2018, Heartland Advisors on behalf of its clients held approximately <0.01% and 0.00% of the total shares outstanding of TechnipFMC PLC and WEC Energy Group, Inc., respectively.

Statements regarding securities are not recommendations to buy or sell.

Portfolio holdings are subject to change without notice. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.

The statements and opinions expressed in the articles or appearances are those of the presenter. Any discussion of investments and investment strategies represents the presenters' views as of the date created and are subject to change without notice. The opinions expressed are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. The specific securities discussed, which are intended to illustrate the advisor’s investment style, do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended by the advisor for client accounts, and the reader should not assume that an investment in these securities was or would be profitable in the future. Certain security valuations and forward estimates are based on Heartland Advisors’ calculations. Any forecasts may not prove to be true.

Economic predictions are based on estimates and are subject to change.

Sector and industry classifications as determined by Heartland Advisors may reference data from sources such as FactSet Research Systems Inc.

Heartland’s investing glossary provides definitions for several terms used on this page.

CFA® is a registered trademark owned by the CFA Institute.

ALPS Distributors, Inc., is not affiliated with Heartland Advisors.